论文部分内容阅读
构式语法和概念框架都是语义的分析解读机制。构式语法将论元结构语义的差别直接归结于构式,强调动词参与者角色和构式角色的融合;概念框架重视框架和语法结构间的语符关系,强调系统的生理可行性,提出概念框架同语法结构、动作系统和感知系统的连通。本文以英语撞击动词为例,探索构式语法和概念框架对于解释动词和小句语义方面的功能,并对二者理论和功能的异同做出分析。
Structural grammar and conceptual framework are semantic analysis and interpretation mechanism. The constructive grammar directly attributed the difference between the semantics of the argument structure to the structure, emphasizing the fusion of the role of the verb participant and the constructive role. The conceptual framework emphasizes the language relations between the framework and the grammatical structure, emphasizing the physiological feasibility of the system and putting forward the concept Framework with the grammatical structure, movement system and perception system connectivity. Taking English collision verbs as an example, this paper explores the functions of constructive grammar and conceptual framework in explaining the semantics of verbs and clauses, and analyzes the similarities and differences between the two theories and functions.