“科技档案‘有偿转让’提法欠妥”一文《载于《黑龙江档案》1993年2期,以下简称“妥文”),对拙作“科技档案的‘非商品性’与有偿转让”一文中的若干表述提出异议,现就有关问题加以说明,一来与“妥文”作者交流学术思想,再者,也借此文澄清一些认识问题。“有偿转让”与科技档案的特性。档案是内容与形式的统一体。科技档案作为科技成果的承载物,自然也是由内容与形式组成的。相比于其他档案,科技档案的特殊性主要体现在其内容上记载着特定的科学技术活动。正因其承载的科学技术是商品,才有“有偿转让”问题之提出。正如“妥文”所言,“技术转让能够实现,是因为技术是商品,可以买卖或转让”。科技档案的 “Manifesto” in “Heilongjiang Archives”, 1993, 2, hereinafter referred to as “Proof ”), the clumsy “scientific and technological files of non-commercial and Paid transfer ”one article in a statement of objections, the relevant issues are now described, one with “ proper language ”the author to exchange academic ideas, but also to take this article to clarify some cognitive issues. “Paid transfer ” and the characteristics of technology files. File is the unity of content and form. As a bearer of scientific and technological achievements, science and technology archives naturally consist of content and form. Compared with other archives, the particularity of science and technology archives is mainly reflected in the content of specific scientific and technological activities. Because of its science and technology is a commodity, only “paid transfer ” issue put forward. As the “proper”, “technology transfer can be achieved because the technology is a commodity, can be traded or transferred.” Technology files