反思刑法“严打”方针维护社会长治久安

来源 :铁道警官高等专科学校学报 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:panweilu
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
近20年来,全国范围内统一组织开展了3次“严打”运动,社会上对“严打”方式和效果都有不同看法。文章对此进行了全面的分析,认为国家根据社会治安情况,在一个时期对犯罪采取严厉的打击方针是有理论和实践根据的。但是,“严打”必须是一贯性的方针,而不能是临时性的措施;应当在法治范围内进行,而不应该冲破法律的限制;同时,对刑罚的功能也应当有个客观正确的评价,国家不能过分依赖刑罚治理社会。 In the past 20 years, the unified organization across the country has carried out three “strike hard” campaigns, and the society has different opinions on the “strike hard” methods and effects. The article has carried on the comprehensive analysis to this, thought that the country according to the social security situation, in a period of crime to take a harsh crackdown policy is based on theory and practice. However, “strike hard” must be a consistent principle, not a temporary measure; it should be carried out within the framework of the rule of law and should not break the legal limit; at the same time, there should be an objective and correct assessment of the function of punishment, The state can not over-rely on penalties to govern the society.
其他文献
为了追诉“隐蔽性无被害人犯罪”,诱惑侦查已为许多国家认可,我国司法实践中对此也有运用。由于诱惑侦查具有无法克服的局限性,极易侵犯公民权利。因此,我国立法应在有限度地