在查办贪污案件的过程中,犯罪嫌疑人对赃款去向的交待总是多种多样,嫌疑人的辩解往往使不同检察机关和人民法院在行为的定性和处理上产生不同的结果,有的地方的司法机关认为只要有证据证实犯罪嫌疑人有贪污赃款的手段,并使公共财物脱离了单位的监管进而破坏了单位对公共财物的所有权,则无论其事后将赃款用于何处,都不影响罪名的认定;有的则 In the process of investigating corruption cases, the criminal suspects always have different interpretations of the whereabouts of stolen money. The justification of the suspects often causes different procuratorial organs and people’s courts to produce different results in the qualitative and handling of acts. In some places Judicial authorities believe that as long as there is evidence that criminal suspects have embezzled means of fraud and public property from the unit’s supervision and thus undermine the unit’s ownership of public property, regardless of its subsequent use of stolen money will not affect the charges The identification; some then