论文部分内容阅读
石刻、碑铭是档案,这一点早已为档案学界所公认,称之为“石刻档案”。但碑拓(即石刻、碑铭的拓片)的属性如何,却很少有人探讨。有幸拜读《档案》1989年第一期郝永华同志(以下称作者)的《碑拓浅议》一文,作者观点新颍,思路开阔,但仔细推敲,又觉“碑拓也是档案”提法十分勉强。首先,碑拓不具备档案的原始属性。原始属性是档案的根本属性,只有具备了原始属性才有可能成为档案,所以作者不惜笔墨来论证碑拓的原始属性。作者的论据之一是“碑拓与石刻、碑铭的内
Stone inscriptions, inscriptions are archives, which has long been recognized by the archivists as “stone archives.” But Beituo (ie, stone inscriptions rubbings) how the property, but few people explore. Fortunate enough to read the document “Beibu Shallow Discussion” written by Comrade Hao Yonghua in the first issue of 1989 in the Archives. The author has a new view and broaden his thinking. However, when he carefully scrutinizes it and feels that “Beituo is also a file” . First of all, Beitou does not have the original attributes of the file. The original attribute is the fundamental attribute of the file, only with the original attribute may become a file, so the author at the writing to prove the original extension of the original attributes. One of the author’s arguments is "monument extension and stone inscriptions inside