论文部分内容阅读
刑法典需要一次系统调整,罪名法定化的契机已到来。司法罪名对于罪名的统一、规范化起到了重要作用,但也存在非正当性、非准确性、非体系性的顽疾。罪名立法模式中,存在法定化和非法定化模式,法定化模式进一步分为标题式罪名、定义式罪名和个别定义式罪名。罪名法定化的整体思路有立法解释、刑法修正案和整体嵌入刑法典的方案可供选择,它们之间操作简易性依次递减、方案优势依次递增。罪名法定化的微观操作就是应当实行标题式罪名、注重罪名的类型化、保持罪名间的协调。
The criminal code needs a systematic adjustment, and the chance of statutory accusation has arrived. Judicial charges play an important role in the unification and standardization of charges, but there are also illicit, inaccurate and unsystematic illnesses. There are legalization and non-statutory modes in the legal model of accusation, and the legalization mode is further divided into the headline charges, defensive charges and individual defensive charges. The legal definition of the whole idea of a legislative interpretation of the Criminal Law and the Criminal Code as a whole embedded in the program to choose from the options between them in descending order of ease of operation, program advantages in turn increase. The legalization of the microscopic operations should be the implementation of the title of guilty, focusing on the type of guilt, to maintain the coordination between guilty.