和许多其他的行政诉讼纠纷一样,(2013)行提字第7号判决(以下简称本案)所涉案情的基础法律关系涉及民法,甚至,如果换一个角度去观察,本案的争议焦点很容易被吸引到民法上去,比如其最为引人注目之处在于,是否“需要”或者“能否”借助民法中的不当得利制度来完成法律适用的前提判断以及论理基础。当然,这样做表面上是厘定不当得利制度的公法、私法的适用空间,其背后真正关涉的则是裁判者的价值判 Like many other administrative litigation disputes, the basic legal relationship in the case of (2013) No. 7 Zixi Zi (hereinafter referred to as the case) involves civil law. Even if the litigation is viewed from another perspective, the focus of controversy in this case can easily be Attracting civil law, such as its most striking is whether “need ” or “can ” with the unjust enrichment system in civil law to complete the premise of legal application and reasoning basis. Of course, this is ostensibly the applicable space for determining the public law and private law for the system of unjust enrichment. What really matters behind this is the value judgment of the referees