论文部分内容阅读
一读了杨晓雄、赵晓东《传统剧目杂辩》一文(见《戏剧报》一九八三年第十期),有几点不同的看法,谨提出来供讨论。杨、赵两同志引了《打渔杀家》中萧恩与李俊、倪荣的几句对白,便想来证明这个戏里也“夹有泥沙”,似乎也宣传了“君无罪,祸由在臣下”的思想,用以印证“产生于旧时代的戏曲传统剧目,不可能回避当时社会给予的影响”这样的观点(即在别的一些文章中被称为“局限性”,的那个东西)之正确。这实在是射错了靶子。《打渔杀家》通过人物形象的刻画告诉了我们,它是富有革命色彩的传统剧目。按照杨、赵两同志的引申,李俊、倪荣说了:“可有圣上旨意?”“户部公文?”便算是承认渔税的合法性,便算是“与皇帝老官以及代表封建政权的户部并无矛盾冲突”,便算表示了“君无罪,祸由在臣下”的观点。那么,杨、赵两同志的意思,是不是要叫李俊、倪荣当着丁郎的面
After reading Yang Xiaoxiong’s and Zhao Xiaodong’s article on “Traditional Drama Miscellaneous Debates” (See The Drama Newspaper, Issue Ten, 1983), there are a few different opinions that I have put forward for discussion. Yang and Zhao comrades drew a few words of dialogue between Xiao En and Li Jun and Ni Rong in “Fishing to Kill Your Home,” and wanted to prove that this movie was also “sandwiched” Evil in the minister “thinking, to prove that” the traditional drama of the opera originated in the old times, it is impossible to evade the influence given by the society at the time “(ie in other articles is called” limitations “ That thing) is correct. This is really the wrong target. ”Fishing to kill home“ tells us through the portrayal of the image of the characters, it is full of revolutionary traditional repertoire. According to the extension of Yang and Zhao comrades, Li Jun and Ni Rong said: ”Can there be the will of the Holy Land?“ ”Official Document of the Ministry of People’s Livelihood“ is the recognition of the legitimacy of the fishing tax. There is no contradiction between the Ministry of households ”, it means that“ Jun innocent, curse under the minister ”point of view. Well, Yang, Zhao comrades meaning, is not to call Li Jun, Ni Rong in the face of Ding Lang