文学院中文系教授查洪德在《文艺研究》2014年第8期发表《不二古今:元代诗学之“师古”“师心”论》一文。文章认为:研究中国诗学史的人一般认为,元代诗学的倾向是复古。元人自己好像也认为,其诗学的走向是趋于古,欧阳玄就说:“我元延祐以来,弥文日盛。京师诸名公,咸宗魏、晋、唐,一去金、宋季世之弊,而趋于雅正。诗丕变而近于古。”(欧阳玄《罗舜美诗序》)但 Literary Institute of Chinese Department of Charles Chand in the “literature and art research” 2014 the eighth issue of “Fuji ancient and modern: Yuan Dynasty poetics” teacher ancient “” teacher “theory” a. The article holds that: People who study the history of Chinese poetics generally think that the tendency of poetics in Yuan Dynasty is retro. Yuan himself seems to think that his poetics tends toward the ancient trend, Ouyang Xuan said: “I YuanYouYao, Mi WenRong Sheng. Gold, the weaknesses of the Song Dynasty, and tend to Yazheng. Poetry Pi change and close to the ancient. ”(Ouyang Xuan“ Luo Shun poetry Preface ”) But