论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨自制入路通道的经脐单孔腹腔镜手术在妇科常见手术中的临床应用。方法:回顾性收集2018年1月至2020年9月克拉玛依市中心医院成功开展的自制入路通道的经脐单孔腹腔镜手术105例，并选择条件匹配的多孔腹腔镜手术105例作对照。比较两组手术时间，术中失血量，术后首次排气时间，术后首次下床活动时间，术后24 h疼痛评分，术后3个月患者手术满意度评分，术后3个月医生对切口美容评分，术后住院时间，术中医生的感受评分及术中、术后并发症。结果:所有手术均在腹腔镜下顺利完成，未中转为开腹手术，未加打辅助孔，术中未出现明显并发症。单孔腹腔镜组手术时间、术中出血量大于多孔腹腔镜组(均n P<0.05)。单孔腹腔镜组切口美容评分明显优于多孔腹腔镜组(n P<0.05)。多孔腹腔镜组术中医生感受评分优于单孔腹腔镜组(n P0.05)。多孔腹腔镜组卵巢囊肿剥除术、子宫肌瘤剔除术、全子宫切除术手术时间及术中出血量小于单孔腹腔镜组(均n P0.05)。多孔腹腔镜组不同手术类型术中医生感受均优于单孔腹腔组(均n P<0.05)。n 结论:在病例选择合适的情况下，经脐单孔腹腔镜手术在妇科手术中是可行的，单孔腹腔镜突出的优点为术后美容效果。“,”Objective:To explore the clinical application of transumbilical single-port laparoscopy with self-made approach in common gynecological operations.Methods:105 cases of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery with self-made approach successfully (single-port laparoscopic group) carried out in Karamay Central Hospital from January 2018 to September 2020 were retrospectively collected, and 105 cases of multi-port laparoscopic surgery (multi-port laparoscopic group) with matching conditions were selected. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative first exhaust time, postoperative first out of bed activity time, postoperative 24-h pain score, postoperative satisfaction score of patients 3 months after operation, incision cosmetic score of doctors 3 months after operation, postoperative hospital stay, intraoperative surgeon′s feeling score and intraoperative and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results:All operations were successfully completed under laparoscopy, without conversion to laparotomy, without auxiliary holes, and no obvious complications occurred during the operation. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the single-port laparoscopic group were greater than those in the multi-port laparoscopic group (all n P<0.05). The incision cosmetic score of single-port laparoscopic group was significantly better than that of multi-port laparoscopic group (n P<0.05). The intraoperative surgeon′s feeling score in multi-port laparoscopic group was better than that in single-port laparoscopic group (n P0.05). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss of ovarian cyst stripping, hysteromyomectomy and total hysterectomy in the multi-port laparoscopic group were less than those in the single-port laparoscopic group (alln P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the operation time and intraoperative blood loss of salpingectomy and adnexectomy (alln P<0.05). The feeling of doctors in multi-port laparoscopic group was better than that in single-port laparoscopic group (alln P<0.05).n Conclusions:Under the condition of appropriate case selection, laparoendosopic single-port surgery with self-made approach is feasible in common gynecological operations. The prominent advantage of laparoendosopic single-port surgery is postoperative cosmetic effect.