论文部分内容阅读
2005年,我们的耳边不断传来资本市场上风头最健的人物爆出丑闻的消息。最突出的莫过于张海、马志平及顾雏军等被刑拘。如今,随着湘酒鬼的实际控制人刘虹被刑拘,公众在感叹又一个资本玩家谢幕的同时,他背后庞大的“成功系”正在崩塌。究竟是一种什么样的力坦,使—个明星企业家成为阶下囚?到底是制度缺位,还是法律缺位?为什么每一桩资本大鳄的倒台事件,始终都有政府的影子? 真实的故事比猜测更令人震撼。《英才》记者亲赴湖南第—新闻现场发现,刘虹不但是当地草根阶层学习的榜样,也是当地政府曾经宣扬的旗帜。刘虹能够一错再错,与错综复杂的政、商关系纠缠在—起,这些错误不只属于—个人,一个集团,而且在中国也绝非偶然。刘虹的发迹和垮台,似乎再次警醒人们,那个过去让刘虹们成功的游戏规则正在改写。但问题的关键是,4．2亿的资金黑洞谁来填?谁来为湘酒鬼埋单?是刘虹本人?是政府?还是广大股民? “国退民进”吵吵嚷嚷已经不短的时日,我们不仅仅关注进退,更关注这个进退谁说了算?谁来考核?谁来监督?谁来负最后的全责?
In 2005, we heard news of the most scandal coming to the forefront of the capital market. The most prominent is Zhang Hai, Ma Zhiping and Gu Chujun were XingJu. Now, with the actual control of the Hunan alcoholic Liu Hong was XingJu, the public laments another capital player curtain call at the same time, behind his huge “success line” is collapsing. What exactly is a force that makes a star entrepreneur in prison? In the end is the absence of the system or the law? Why does the downfall of every capital predator always have the shadow of the government? True The story is even more shocking than speculation. “Talented” reporter went to Hunan Province - News scene found that Liu Hong is not only an example for local grassroots learning, but also a banner the local government once promoted. Liu Hong is capable of repeating mistakes once and for all, and is entangled in complicated political and commercial relations. These mistakes belong not only to individuals, to a group, but also not accidental in China. Liu Hong's fortune and collapse, it seems that once again alert people, that the rules of the past so that Liu Hong's success is being rewritten. But the crux of the problem is that it is not a short time for the “420 million blacklists of funds to fill in the list of people who are going to pay for Xiangguo ghosts” or “Liu Hong himself” or “the government or the general public” , We are not only concerned about the advance and retreat, but also concerned about the advance and retreat who had the final say Who is to assess Who will supervise Who will take the final responsibility?