论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨在儿科疾病检验中应用C反应蛋白(CRP)联合血常规检验的效果。方法:选取2015年5月至2016年8月广州市天河区前进街社区卫生服务中心门诊发热患儿或急性肺炎感染患儿201例作为观察组,选取同期入院的身体检查结果为健康的儿童201例作为对照组,观察组患儿在对照组患儿进行的血常规检验的基础上,追加进行CRP检测,收集两组患儿CRP升高、正常比例,评测患儿血常规在Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ级的比重,记录两组患儿的CRP值进行比较分析。结果:观察组CRP升高率为100%,而对照组的CRP升高率仅为4.98%,两组数据比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。血常规检验观察组中Ⅰ级有98例、Ⅱ级有96例,明显优于对照组,两组数据比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组CRP的含量为(72.91±2.73)mg·L~(-1),高于对照组的(3.84±0.18)mg·L~(-1),两组数据比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:CRP联合血常规检验在儿科疾病检验中判断明确,效果十分明显,对患儿的后续针对性治疗起到了积极的作用。
Objective: To investigate the effect of C-reactive protein (CRP) combined with blood test in pediatric disease test. Methods: From May 2015 to August 2016, 201 children with outpatient fever or children with acute pneumonia in Qianjin Street Community Health Service Center, Tianhe District, Guangzhou City were selected as the observation group. The healthy children 201 Cases as a control group, children in the observation group in the control group of children on the basis of blood tests, additional CRP test, the two groups were collected CRP increased, normal proportion, evaluation of children with blood in Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ grade specific gravity, record the CRP values of two groups of children for comparative analysis. Results: The CRP increase rate in the observation group was 100%, while the CRP increase rate in the control group was only 4.98%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). In the blood test group, there were 98 grade Ⅰ and 96 grade Ⅱ in the observation group, which was significantly better than the control group. There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). The level of CRP in the observation group was (72.91 ± 2.73) mg · L -1, which was higher than that in the control group (3.84 ± 0.18) mg · L -1. There was significant difference between the two groups P <0.05). Conclusion: CRP combined with blood tests in the pediatric disease test to determine a clear, the effect is very obvious, the follow-up targeted treatment of children has played a positive role.