如果把美国的艺术家Paul Chan的文章:《艺术是什么艺术义属于哪里?》其中一段非常本质地描述艺术是什么的文字中的“艺术”两个字置换成“美术馆”或“艺术机构”的话,同样非常有意义:“艺术机构就是这样成为艺术机构的。艺术机构超过创造者的意图,一个想法的精髓,一次体验,或一种存在,艺术机构表达了最多就是它是什么和它想成为什么之间的不可调和,艺术机构必须存在于一个物质现实内,才能充分实现自己。但不一样的是艺术机构塑造事物,赋予其物质现实,却从下主宰它,每件事物都吸收,并对其生成、积累的用途和价值。产生影响的各种力量,并从内部散发这种历史的在场及多种意义。” If the article by Paul Chan, a U.S. artist, “Where does art belong?” Is replaced by the word “art” in a text that describes the art very much as “art museum” or The same is true of “art agency”: “Art institutions are thus the art institutions that exceed the creator’s intentions, the essence of an idea, an experience, or a being, and the art organization expresses the most It is irreconcilable between what it is and what it wants to be and that the art institution must exist within a material reality to fully realize itself, but not the same is that the art institution shapes things and gives them material reality but dominates it , Everything absorbs, and generates, accumulates use and value, exerts its influence, and internally distributes the presence and significance of such history. ”