论文部分内容阅读
关于领导者的基本素质和修养,国内外的研究者提出了各种不同的观点。这些观点在定义的表述上意见纷呈,在内容的涵义上大同小异。主要的有素质说、修养说、品质说等,其中的素质说最为普遍。另有影响力说,也是研究素质和修养的内容。这些观点的共同倾向是,将素质和修养作为两个不同的概念来看待。一般把素质又作狭义和广义之分。狭义的素质归纳为人的先天的解剖生理特点:广义的素质则包括人的性格、兴趣、气宇、毅力、风度和知识等等,而把修养当作后天的自我完善,认为可以通过“补偿作用”而获得。实际上,关于修养还没有独立的定义,就其含义来看,它已经渗透到广义的素质之中了。由于这种概念的渗透性,给以往的论述带来很
With regard to the basic qualities and accomplishments of leaders, researchers at home and abroad have come up with different opinions. These views on the definition of the expression of opinions, the content of the meaning is much the same. The main quality, said cultivation, quality, etc., of which the most common quality. Another influence that is also the content of the study of quality and accomplishment. The common tendency of these views is to regard quality and accomplishment as two different concepts. The quality is generally narrow and broad points. Narrow sense of the generalization of the human anatomy and physiology characteristics of the human body: the general quality of the human personality, including interest, aura, perseverance, demeanor and knowledge, etc., and the cultivation as acquired acquired self-improvement, that can be “compensatory role” And get. In fact, there is no independent definition of accomplishment, which, in its meaning, has infiltrated into a broad sense of quality. Due to the permeability of this concept, it brings with it the previous discourse