最近听到不少观众对某些新片又有一些批评,认为,编造痕迹过于严重,虚假造作、缺乏生活依据,因而不真实,不可信,不感动人。但是,也有几位电影剧作者抱怨说,自己对所描写的内容是有感情的,所以才去着力表现;或是为了写一个作品,花了相当长时间,广泛采访了有关对象,查阅了大量有关文字资料。因此,所写的故事大致轮廓与生活实际还是符合的。既然如此,为什么仍然会被观众们讥评为“虚假的”呢?问题的症结到底在哪里呢? Recently, many audiences have heard some criticisms of certain new films. They think that creating traces is too serious, false and contrived, and lacks a basis for living. Therefore, they are untrue, untrustworthy and touching. However, several film writers complained that they felt emotionally about the content they were describing and therefore tried hard to express themselves. Or it took quite a long time to write a workbook, interviewed a wide range of subjects and consulted a large number Relevant text information. Therefore, the general outline of the story written is still consistent with the actual life. In that case, why are they still scoffed as “false” by the audience? Where exactly is the crux of the problem?