论文部分内容阅读
抗日战争全面爆发后,对日采取什么样的作战方针,成为摆在中国共产党面前的重大课题之一。土地革命战争时期,红军反“围剿”的主要作战形式是运动战,即以正规兵团在较长战线和广大区域大踏步前进或后退,集中进行战役战斗上的外线速决的进攻战。但在抗日战争时期,战争态势、作战对象和八路军的实际状况都发生了重大变化,客观形势的发展要求必须对军事战略方针进行调整,即从运动战战略向游击战战略转变。然而,在八路军出兵前后,对于采取什么军事战略方针,中央同前方八路军部分将领之间出现过争议。毛泽东在1943年9月7日至10月6日期间召开的中共中央政治局会议的发言中说过,“1937年洛川会议通过的决议,实际上有人是不同意的,在形势估计、国共关系、战略方针这三个问题上有不同意见。”①因此,厘清这一分歧,对认识抗战初期中国共产党军事战略方针的转变具有重要意义。
After the full launch of the anti-Japanese war, what kind of operational policy was taken against Japan became one of the major topics before the Chinese Communist Party. During the period of the Agrarian Revolutionary War, the main combat mode of the Red Army’s “encirclement and suppression” campaign was that of the mobile warfare, that is, the offensive in which the regular regiment marched forward or retreated on a long-term front and in the vast area and focused on the quick-firing external battle on the campaign battle. However, during the period of the War of Resistance Against Japan, major changes have taken place in the actual situation of the war situation, objects of warfare and the Eighth Route Army. The development of the objective situation calls for the readjustment of the military strategic guideline, that is, from a strategy of campaign war to a guerrilla warfare. However, before and after the Eighth Route Army was dispatched, there was a dispute over some of the military strategic directions adopted between the Central Government and some of the generals of the former Eighth Route Army. In his speech at the meeting of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee held from September 7 to October 6, 1943, Mao Zedong said: “The resolution passed at the Luochuan Conference in 1937 actually did not agree. According to the assessment of the situation, The KMT-CPC relations and the strategic guidelines have different views on these three issues. ”① Therefore, clarifying this disagreement is of great significance for understanding the changes in the CPC’s military strategy in the early days of the war of resistance.