论文部分内容阅读
一、问题的提出近年来我国经济学界对宏观经济管理做了比较多的讨论,这些讨论十分有益。然而我们也看到,在这些讨论中诸如对宏观经济究竟是采取“总量分析”还是“结构分析”这样的争论所涉及的根本问题,究竟以什么标准来判定宏观经济状态的好坏。宋国青等同志在《宏观经济理论中的若干理论分歧》中提出了“衡量宏观经济状态的指标”问题,但却未能解决这个问题,只是认为单独以某种指标来衡量一个经济状态都有问题,并在最后概括说“总的来看,在判断宏观经济状态方面,我们目前的理论和方法还十分欠缺,需要不断摸索。”
First, the issue put forward In recent years, China's economic circles have done more discussion of macroeconomic management, these discussions are very useful. However, we also see that in these discussions, such as whether the macroeconomy is the fundamental issue involved in such an argument as “gross analysis” or “structural analysis”, what criteria are used to judge the state of the macroeconomy? Song Guoqing and other comrades put forward the “measure of macroeconomic indicators” in “Several Theoretical Disagreements in Macroeconomic Theory”, but failed to solve the problem. They only think that it is problematic to measure a single economic status by some measure alone , And concludes with a conclusion: “Generally speaking, our present theories and methods are still very scarce in judging the macroeconomic status and need to be constantly explored.”