论文部分内容阅读
本文以2016年美总统大选第二场电视辩论希拉里和特朗普的辩论词为语料,分析隐喻、框架以及道德模型三者在政治语篇中的关系,研究发现:(1)民主党和共和党奉行的道德模型是其辩论的最深层的隐喻框架;(2)美国两党善用隐喻为议题构建次级框架,再通过一系列相互关联的隐喻或非隐喻的话语表达强化次级框架,使得自身的道德观深入民心,达到自己的政治意图。(3)道德模型—议题框架—话语表达对应于政治语篇的深层框架—次级框架—表层框架。
This dissertation analyzes the relationship between metaphor, framework and moral model in political discourse based on the debates of Hillary Clinton and Trump in the second TV debate in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. The findings are as follows: (1) Democrats and Republicans (2) The two parties in the United States make good use of metaphor to construct a sub-framework for the issue, and then strengthen the secondary framework through a series of interrelated metaphors or non-metaphorical discourses to make Own morality goes deep into the people’s hearts and reaches its own political intention. (3) Moral Model - Topic Framework - Discourse Expression Corresponds to the Deep Framework of Political Discourse - Secondary Framework - Surface Framework.