论文部分内容阅读
主权财富基金在他国开展投资活动不可避免地发生纠纷甚至遭遇诉讼,而主权财富基金能否就此主张司法豁免成为一个亟待解决的问题。关于主权财富基金的管辖豁免主体资格,《联合国国家及其财产管辖豁免公约》和《美国外国主权豁免法》给出了不同的答案,在管辖豁免行为条件认定上,二者都反映了限制豁免原则的趋势认定主权财富基金从事的投资行为属于商业活动而原则上不享有管辖豁免。关于强制性措施豁免,较管辖豁免两法都规定了更为严格的条件,为主权财富基金主张强制性措施豁免提供了更多的可能。
Sovereign wealth funds in other countries to carry out investment activities inevitably disputes or even litigation, and sovereign wealth funds in this regard can claim judicial immunity has become a problem to be solved. With regard to the sovereign jurisdictional immunities of sovereign wealth funds, the United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and their Property and the United States Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act give different answers and both of them reflect the restriction of exemptions The trend of the principle finds that investment activities conducted by sovereign wealth funds belong to commercial activities and in principle do not enjoy jurisdictional immunity. With regard to the exemption from compulsory measures, more stringent conditions are stipulated than the two exemptions from jurisdictional exemptions, which provide more possibilities for sovereign wealth funds to advocate exemptions from mandatory measures.