前言 以前的研究已经揭示了G防护效果是抗荷服覆盖面积的函数。此项研究的目的是比较穿用三种气囊面积不同的装置时的+Gz耐力和循环系统的反应。方法 6名男性志愿者随机进行4次下列松弛的离心机试验:①无抗-G保护;②新型标准抗荷服(S);③加大覆盖面积原型(Ec);④Ec加防护靴(ECB)。离心机持续10s的2G、5G平台,然后每次上升1G(以0.8G/s 的速度)。终点是80°周边光感消失。在心脏水 Preface Previous studies have revealed that the protective effect of G is a function of the area covered by the load. The purpose of this study was to compare + Gz endurance and circulatory system responses when wearing devices of three different balloon sizes. Methods Six male volunteers were randomly subjected to the following four relaxation centrifuge tests: ① no anti-G protection; ② new standard anti-static clothing (S); ③ increased coverage area prototype (Ec); ④ EC plus protective boots ). Centrifuge for 10s of 2G, 5G platform, and then each rise 1G (at 0.8G / s speed). The end point is 80 ° light perception disappears. In the heart of water