论文部分内容阅读
历代学者对郑玄、王肃学说对立都有各种不同的评论,但未能深入探讨他们达到那些结论的思维过程。本文分析郑王礼说最重要的几个问题,认为郑王之间,解经的目的、性质完全不同,指出郑玄对经纬文献记载互相矛盾之处,往往解释为不同情况,以便避开矛盾,因而形成庞大复杂、脱离现实的观念理论体系;王肃关注礼说的实践性,对经书进行合情合理的解释,为此目的敢于忽视各种文献中本来存在的各种差异及矛盾。
The ancient scholars have different comments on Zheng Xuan and Wang Su’s theory, but they fail to discuss in depth the thinking process of reaching the conclusions. This article analyzes some of the most important issues raised by Zheng Wangli and points out that the purpose and nature of Zhengwang’s interpretation of the scriptures are completely different. It is pointed out that Zheng Xuan’s conflicting records of Jingwei literature are often interpreted as different situations so as to avoid the contradiction and thus form Huge and complicated and out of touch with reality. Wang Su paid attention to the practicality of rituals and explained the scriptures rationally and rationally. For this purpose, he dared ignore all the differences and contradictions that existed in various documents.