这本书的第一印象是,名字取得不好。一看《鲁迅报告》,有点不知所云。不知是鲁迅主动向教育部报告他收了多少卢布,还是有人调查了鲁迅收了多少卢布向教育部报告。翻开书才知道,原来是把鲁迅的讲演稿编成一本集子,那我想,不如就名之曰《鲁迅演讲》,岂不爽朗而痛快?但是我这番责备似乎有点站着说话不腰疼。因为江力先生不是专业的学者,或者反过来说,他是个不评职称不立项目的“干净”的学者。他这类被鲁迅笔下的学者看成一般“文学青年” The first impression of this book is that the name is not getting well. A look at “Lu Xun Report”, a bit unintelligible. I do not know Lu Xun took the initiative to report to the Ministry of Education how much he received the ruble, or was it investigated how much Lu Luxun received a report to the Ministry of Education. It turned out that I had compiled Lu Xun’s lectures into a collection of books, and I thought it would be better if the name of “Lu Xun’s speech” was not so bright and cheerful. However, my reproof seems to be a bit of a standstill Not back pain. Because Mr. Jiang Li is not a professional scholar or, conversely, he is a “clean” scholar who does not judge the title. Such scholars as Lu Xun’s writings are generally regarded as “literary youths”