论文部分内容阅读
一、主要学说对于法律规避行为是否有效的问题,各国在立法、理论和实践中存在着严重的分歧。有些国家认为法律规避有效,有些国家认为法律规避无效。在立法上是否明确规定法律规避制度,各个国家也不尽相同,在禁止或限制法律规避的国家中,这些国家均明确否定当事人规避内国法律的效力,而对规避外国法的效力,有些国家认为有效,有些国家认为无效。大陆法系国家与英美法系国家更是存在着尖锐的对立。主要存在以下几种学说:一是法律规避无效论,二是法律规避有效论,三是法律规避相对有效论。
First, the main doctrine of the law to circumvent the question of the validity of the act, all countries in the legislation, theory and practice there are serious differences. Some countries think that laws evade effective, and some countries think that legal avoidance is invalid. In the legislation, whether to explicitly stipulate the system of legal avoidance is not the same for all countries. In the countries that prohibit or restrict legal avoidance, these countries all clearly denied the parties the effectiveness of circumventing domestic laws. However, some countries think that Effective, some countries think it is invalid. There is a sharp antagonism between civil law countries and common law countries. There are mainly the following theories: First, the law to avoid invalid theory, the second is to evade effective theory, and the third is to avoid the relative validity of the law.