论文部分内容阅读
从古典犯罪论体系到新古典体系,价值判断渗透,超法规违法阻却事由如雨后春笋。与构成要件不同,违法阻却事由发迹于理论,而后渗入立法之中。因此在违法性的判断上,应当采用“倒置三段论”的逻辑思维,先对实质违法性进行定界。在此问题上,多元论杂乱无序、南辕北辙;社会相当理论言人人殊、言之无物。介于法益衡量说的固有缺陷,应当建构个体利益—制度利益—社会公共利益的三层次利益衡量理论,在构成要件之后进行实质违法性的检视。违法阻却事由只是实质违法性判断后的类型化和具象化形式,遵从利益衡量规则的约束。
From the classical crime theory system to the neoclassical system, the value judgments infiltrated, super-laws and regulations to prevent the law from springing up. Different from the constitutional requirements, the law of impeding the obstruction of fortune in theory, and then infiltrated into the legislation. Therefore, in judging the illegality, we should adopt the logical thinking of “inverted syllogism” and first delimit the substantive illegality. On this issue, multivariate theory is disorderly and disorderly with its own opposite direction. Between the inherent flaws of the law-benefit measurement theory, a three-level interest measurement theory of individual interest-system interest-social public interest should be constructed, and the substantive illegality should be examined after the elements are formed. The obstruction of the law is only the type and the concrete form after the judgment of substantive illegality, and it is subject to the restraint of the rules for the measurement of interests.