王利明撰文《论债法总则与合同法总则的关系》指出,我国已经制定了《合同法》,其内容和体系都相当完备,而且充分顾及了现代合同法的发展趋势。债法具有一般性和抽象性,但不能替代合同法总则的功能。因此,民法典中的债法总则与合同法、侵权责任法将共同成为民法典分则的组成部分。在这样一种体系结构下,债法总则的制定不应当影响合同法体系的完整性,而合同法总则也不能代替债法总则,我国债法总则的设计,应当 Wang Liming’s article “On the Relationship between the General Principles of the Law of Debts and the General Principles of Contract Law” points out that our country has formulated the “Contract Law,” its content and system are quite complete, and takes full account of the development trend of modern contract law. Debt law is general and abstract, but can not replace the function of the general law of contract law. Therefore, the general principles of debt law, contract law and tort law of civil law will all together become part of the subdivisions of Civil Code. Under such an architecture, the formulation of the general principles of debt law should not affect the integrity of the contract law system, and the general principles of the contract law can not replace the general principle of the debt law. The design of the general principle of the debt law in our country should,