论文部分内容阅读
1996年修改后的《刑事诉讼法》第140条第4款确立了“存疑不起诉”制度,体现了立法者在解决存疑案件时的考量。但是,该条规定文字表述简单且存有争议,以至于实践中的做法不一,背离了“存疑不起诉”的初衷。因此,本文认为有必要对该法条及相关的司法解释进行梳理,从法律规定的条件、效力等方面重新审视我国的“存疑不起诉”制度。
Article 140, paragraph 4, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as amended in 1996, established the system of “non-prosecution of doubts and no doubt,” which reflects the legislators’ consideration in resolving cases of doubt. However, the article stipulates that the written language is simple and controversial, so that practices in practice vary from the original intention of “doubting no prosecution.” Therefore, this article thinks it is necessary to sort out the law and the related judicial interpretation, and reexamine our country’s “system of doubtful prosecution” from the aspects stipulated by the law and its effectiveness.