论文部分内容阅读
各报都登载了一则图片新闻:1999年5月17日,新华社再赴南斯拉夫采访记者穿上了有关部门赠送的防弹衣。这消息让人有当头棒喝之感——假若当初邵云环等三位记者也有人送防弹衣,也穿上了防弹衣,他们是否可以免遭牺牲呢?也许至少不会立即牺牲,或只会受伤? 我万分敬佩现在给赴南中国记者送防弹衣的人。这说明他们已想到,虽然有此次中国人民和全世界人民的坚决抗议,但是,这并不能保证中国驻南大使馆再不会遭受北约袭击,不能担保类似事件再不会发生,也不等于对方已接受了中国人不可暴力欺压的观念。这种亡羊补牢的预报哲学,实在有必要大力推广。美中不足的是,假若这种“灾情预报”早些时进行——当中美高层人
Each newspaper published a picture News: On May 17, 1999, Xinhua News Agency went to Yugoslavia and interviewed reporters wearing the bullet-proof vests presented by relevant departments. The news made people feel overwhelmed - if the original three reporters such as Shao Yunhuan also sent bullet-proof vests, also put on body armor, they can be protected from sacrificing it? Perhaps at least not immediately sacrificed, or will only be injured? I very much admire the people who now send bullet-proof vests to reporters in southern China. This shows that they have come to the conclusion that although there are this resolute protest by the Chinese people and people all over the world, this does not guarantee that the Chinese embassy in South China will not be subjected to a NATO attack any more. It can not guarantee that similar incidents will not happen again or that the other side has accepted Chinese people can not be oppressed by violence concept. This forecasting philosophy, it is necessary to vigorously promote. The fly in the ointment is that if this “disaster prediction” is carried out earlier - as the high-level Chinese and the U.S. people