论文部分内容阅读
与此同时,同样诞生于当代中国古典舞的发生地——北京舞蹈学院,比它晚一年的另一部打着“中国古典舞”旗号的作品《风吟》则是一个饱受话题争议的作品。与当代中国的诸多舞蹈精品一样,这两部作品都发生于课堂,在比赛中获得认可,再反过头来作用于课堂的教学。由此一来,本来“中国古典舞”如何创作,“中国古典舞”的作品如何界定,这样一个学术范围内的问题就成为了“更加是问题”的问题,因为它还不同层面地牵扯到了古典舞教育。用肢体言传身教的本质是舞蹈观、艺术观乃至世界观和人生观的传递。因此,一旦《扇舞丹青》
At the same time, the same place was born in the contemporary Chinese classical dance place - Beijing Dance Academy, later than it another year, the name of the “Chinese classical dance” under the banner of “Windy” is a subject Controversial topic of the work. Like many contemporary dance choreography in China, both of these works have taken place in the classroom, gain recognition during the competition and, in turn, act on classroom instruction. As a result, the issue of how “Chinese classical dance” has been created and “Chinese classical dance” has been defined has become such an academic issue as “more problematic” because it Different levels also involve the classical dance education. The essence of using body language to teach is the transmission of dance concept, artistic concept and even world view and outlook on life. Therefore, once “Fan Dan Dan”