论文部分内容阅读
目的了解上海市2013年医疗执业行政处罚案件案由使用情况及其特点,为改进卫生行政处罚工作提供参考依据。方法收集和整理来自2013年上海市卫生监督综合应用平台中的卫生行政处罚案件数据,运用Excel2007进行分析。结果 2013年医疗执业行政处罚案件可用案由的使用比为30.33%,其中案由使用比最高的专业为医疗机构(64.71%),其次是母婴保健(44.14%),最低的是血液卫生(2.13%);医疗机构的行政处罚案件案由使用比超过10%的为1种,使用比为62.00%;医务人员、母婴保健中案由使用比超过10%的均为2种,使用比分别为55.00%、24.05%和47.06%、43.14%,医疗事故和血液卫生的实际使用案由均为1种。结论整体上看2013年医疗执业行政处罚案件可用案由的使用比不高,案由的使用存在着少用、未用的情况;各专业内部的案由使用比之间存在一定的不均衡性。
Objective To understand the use cases and characteristics of medical administrative sanctions cases in Shanghai in 2013 and provide references for improving sanitation administrative sanctions. Methods Collect and sort the data of health administrative sanctions cases from Shanghai Sanitation Supervision Composite Application Platform in 2013 and analyze with Excel2007. Results In 2013, the ratio of available cases for administrative sanctions in medical practice was 30.33%. Among them, 64.71% were maladjusted medical institutions, 44.14% were maternal and child health care, and 2.13% ); Medical institutions in the case of administrative penalties by the use of more than 10% for a species, the use of 62.00%; medical staff, maternal and child health care use more than 10% of the two were used, the use of respectively 55.00% , 24.05% and 47.06%, 43.14% respectively. The actual use cases of medical malpractice and hematological hygiene were all 1 case. Conclusions As a whole, the use cases of administrative sanctions in medical practice in 2013 are not as good as the cases that are available for medical practice. There are few cases of using or not using the cases for medical administrative sanctions. There is a certain imbalance in the use of cases within various disciplines.