Epidemiology and region-specific risk factors for low Apgar scores in China:a nationwide study

来源 :世界儿科杂志(英文版) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:srepair555
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
Background Neonatal asphyxia is a serious public health issue.This study aimed to determine the epidemiology and region-specific risk factors for low Apgar scores,an important proxy for neonatal asphyxia,in China from 2015 to 2016.Methods The China Labor and Delivery Survey was a multicenter cross-sectional study including 96 hospitals distributed in 24 (out of 34) provinces.Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the risk factors for a low Apgar score(< 7).Correspondence analyses were performed among neonates with low Apgar scores to explore the relationship between risk factors and geographical regions.The population attributable risk percentage (PAR%) was calculated for each region-specific risk factor.Results A total of 72,073 live births,including 320 births with low Apgar scores,were used for the analysis,giving a weighted rate of 3.9/1000 live births.There was a substantial difference in the incidence of low Apgar scores by geographic region,from 2.3/1000 live births in East China to 10.9/1000 live births in Northeast China.Maternal and obstetric factors are the major region-specific risk factors.In Southwest China,hypertensive disorders in pregnancy were more important contributors,with PAR% being 74.47%;in North and Northwest China,pre-pregnancy underweight was a more significant factor,with PAR% of 62.92%;in East China,infants born between 0:00 a.m.and 7:59 a.m.were a key factor,with PAR%of 80.44%.Conclusion Strategies based on region-specific risk factors should be considered to reduce the burden of low Apgar scores in China.
其他文献
近年来,食品质量安全问题呈现出高发趋势,威胁公共卫生安全,因此做好食品安全检验工作至关重要.食品安全检验中,微生物检测技术为食品安全监督管理提供了重要的技术支撑与保障.基于此,本文概述了食品安全检验的重要性,分析了食品微生物检测技术的现状以及微生物检测技术,探讨了微生物检测技术在食品安全检验领域的具体应用以及注意事项.
目的:研究超声多参数评分量表对颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架植入术或颈动脉内膜剥脱术不良转归事件的预测价值.方法:以进行颈动脉支架植入术或颈动脉内膜剥脱术的颈动脉狭窄患者150例为研究对象,将术后1年发生再狭窄、脑卒中或者死亡等不良转归事件的患者纳入转归不良组(35例),将转归良好的患者纳入转归良好组(115例).比较两组患者术前3 d及术后1个月的超声多参数评分量表评分.比较两组患者不稳定性斑块积分比、斑块最大偏心比、斑块溃疡、斑块最大长度、斑块最大厚度、斑块面积狭窄率、血管重构、僵硬指数、狭窄处峰值流速以及
A 2-month-old girl presented facial dimorphism,includ-ing frontal bossing,hypertelorism,a broad nasal bridge,low-set ears,hypotonia with mild spasticity,and mild thrombocytopenia.Her head circumference was 40.8 cm(75-90 percentile).There was no relevant p
期刊
《老年病护理管理学》指出,心脏病发病急骤、凶险,极大地威胁着人们的健康,而冠心病一直以来是严重威胁患者的重要疾病之一.随着我国人口老龄化的日益加剧和不良生活方式的逐渐增多,冠心病已成为了一个常见病.冠心病的发病率逐渐攀升,且呈现年轻化趋势.情绪波动、越来越高强度的工作方式、作息不规律等都会为身体健康埋下隐患.
期刊
目的 探讨玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗注射液用于眼底病患者视力、黄斑厚度及生活质量改善效果.方法 选取2016年8月-2020年1月期间在本院诊治的眼底病患者60例作为对象.所有患者按就诊顺序编号,并根据编号将其完全随机分为两组.给予参照组(30例,患眼30眼)患者常规基础性治疗,研究组(30例,患眼30眼)患者再加行玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗注射液治疗.研究方案获得医院伦理委员会审批.观察患者症状改善、视力、眼压、视网膜厚度等改善情况.结果 研究组平均新生血管、视网膜出血、视网膜水肿消失时间、平均恢复正常视网膜厚度时
目的:检测先天性心脏病患儿血清微小RNA(miR)-148b-3p表达水平,探究其临床意义.方法:选取先天性心脏病患儿150例为研究对象(试验组),根据患儿情况又分为单纯房间隔缺损组(48例)、单纯室间隔缺损组(37例)以及复合组(65例).选取同期进行健康体检的儿童150例为对照组.采用实时荧光定量PCR(qRT-PCR)检测两组儿童血清miR-148b-3p表达水平.采用全自动生化分析仪检测两组儿童血清肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)水平.采用酶联免疫吸附(ELISA)法检测两组儿童血清中肌钙蛋白I(cT
目的:探讨核因子-κB(NF-κB)p65和骨桥蛋白(OPN)在子宫内膜癌组织及细胞中的表达,并分析两者的相关性.方法:收集子宫内膜腺癌患者35例(子宫内膜腺癌组)、子宫内膜非典型增生患者35例(非典型增生内膜组)和正常子宫内膜患者35例(正常子宫内膜组),采用免疫组织化学法检测三组子宫内膜组织中NF-κB p65、OPN蛋白的表达.采用反转录PCR(RT-PCR)及Western blot检测正常内膜细胞及子宫内膜癌HEC-1-B细胞中两者蛋白及mRNA的相对表达水平.采用Pearson法分析NF-κB
目的:检测腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者D-二聚体水平,并分析其与腹主动脉瘤最大直径、腔内血栓厚度的相关性.方法:收集确诊为AAA并接受住院治疗的患者50例为AAA组.选取同期入院、年龄和性别与AAA组基本匹配且经影像学检查排除AAA的患者50例为对照组.比较两组D-二聚体、C-反应蛋白(CRP)、白蛋白(ALB)及C反应蛋白与白蛋白比值(CAR),分析D-二聚体水平与AAA存在的关系.依据AAA最大直径将50例AAA患者分为大瘤体组(直径≥5.0 cm,26例)和小瘤体组(直径<5.0 cm,24例),比较两
Duplex kidney,also known as duplicated kidney or renal duplication,is a form of congenital anomaly of kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) characterized by the presence of two pelvicalyceal systems,dividing a kidney into upper and lower pole moieties.The inci
期刊
目的:研究CT联合MRI评估肝细胞癌(HCC)病理分级的可行性.方法:选择HCC患者89例为研究对象,根据Edmondson-Steiner分级法分为高分化组(29例)、中分化组(29例)、低分化组(31例).所有患者进行CT及MRI检查.CT检查记录肝动脉灌注量(HAP)及门静脉灌注量(PVP).MRI检查记录脂肪分数(FF)及最小表观扩散系数(ADCmin).比较三组患者HAP、PVP、FF、ADCmin.分析HCC患者HAP与PVP、FF与ADCmin的相关性.评价CT和MRI各指标鉴别HCC病理分