无论主办者如何强调主旋律,我的眼里,全国美展只是一种名义——以艺术的名义考量艺术的存在与发展。在此名义下,主办者深谋远虑,参与者殚精竭虑。主办方渴望每届都是最好的展事,参与者则希望自己的作品就是最好的作品。然而,当所有渴望“最好”的愿望叠加时,其结果却并非尽如人愿。每届全国美展后,总有不满甚至极为不满的人站出来指责。由于这种情形,众多机构与媒体开始反思。其实,诸多反思,不管是否精妙,都不会对主办方及展事设计产生本质影响。相反,倒是形形色色的各类反思和建议甚至指责,成了全国美展的预热或“外围展”。它们事实上成了 Regardless of how the organizers emphasize the theme, in my opinion, the national art exhibition is just a name - considering the existence and development of art in the name of art. In this name, the sponsor foresight, attendees tried their best. The organizers are keen to each exhibition is the best, participants are hoping their work is the best work. However, when all the desires for “best” are superimposed, the result is not as good as one wishes. After each national art exhibition, there are always dissatisfied or even extremely dissatisfied people stand up and blame. Because of this situation, many agencies and the media began to reflect. In fact, many reflections, whether or not exquisite, will not have an essential impact on the organizers and the design of the exhibition. On the contrary, it is all kinds of reflections and suggestions of all kinds or even accusations, which have become preheating or “peripheral exhibition ” of the national art exhibition. They have actually become