尽管吴敏一自己不承认,但在旁观者看来,他的弃政从商多少有些负气的意味:有从政的抱负,有从政的能力,可是从政平台太小。于是,在没有落实“下家”的时候,他就作出下海的选择,这使吴敏一成了近年来弃政从商潮中的一个异类。 我们不想讨论吴敏一下海是否因为负气,我们感兴趣的,是吴敏一自己提出的一个问题:官员从政平台的大小到底有谁来决定?这个问题,已经超出了吴辞职下海的事实本身,不是我们报道的重点,但很多受访者表示,讨论一下这样的非重点问题,或许比事实本身更有价值。 Although Wu Min-yi himself does not admit it, his abandonment of government, on the bystander’s view, is somewhat negative: there is an ambition of political power and an ability to make politics. However, the political platform is too small. As a result, he made the decision of going to sea without implementing “Xiajia”, which made Wu Min-ch’i a stranger in abandoning his government from the business logic in recent years. We do not want to talk about whether Wu Min’s move to the sea is an issue we are interested in because Wu Min-yi himself raised the question: Who is the size of the political platform of the government? This question has gone beyond the fact that Wu resigned in the sea, Not the focus of our coverage, but many interviewees said that discussing such non-priority issues may be more valuable than the facts themselves.