论文部分内容阅读
关于军臣单于即位年代,一般认为是汉文帝后元三年,也有少数人认为是汉文帝后元五年。经考证,上述二说不确,军臣单于当立于汉文帝后元四年。徐广最早得出了军臣单于立于汉文帝后元三年的结论,其根据不仅相当薄弱,且自相矛盾。从徐广引古本《史记·匈奴列传》可证传本《史记·匈奴列传》“后四岁,老上稽粥单于死,子军臣立为单于”之“岁”字当为“年”字的讹文。“后四年”就是汉文帝后元四年。从《汉书·匈奴传》亦可证军臣单于立于汉文帝后元四年。《翰苑》军臣单于“立四岁”引自《史记》的可能性远远大于引自《汉书》的可能性。
On the military minister single ascended the throne, generally considered to be Chinese Emperor Diyuan three years, there are a few people think that Chinese Emperor Di Yuan five years. The textual research shows that the above two said that military officials were solemnly established in the Han emperor after Yuan four years. Xu Guang first came to the conclusion that the military minister was only based on the reign of Emperor Han Wen in three years. Its basis was not only quite weak but also self-contradictory. From Xu Guang cited the ancient “Historical Biography of Huns Biography” can be evidence of the “Historical Biography Huns Biography” after the age of four, the old book on death alone, The word should be the “erroneous text” of the word “year”. “After four years ” is the Han Emperor Emperor Yuan four years. From the “Han Biography of Huns” can also be military orders single Li Yuanyuan in Chinese emperor four years. The possibility of “John Court” military officials being single in “Four Years Old” quoted from “Historical Records” is far greater than that quoted from “Han”.