论文部分内容阅读
引言最高人民法院2013年12月25日颁布的《量刑指导意见》及各省、自治区、直辖市随后制定的《实施细则》对于调节基准刑的常见量刑情节规定的调节比例幅度较大。而同样的量刑情节调节比例的不同必然导致最后对基准刑调节结果存在差异,从而影响最终的量刑。这虽然赋予了法官较大的自由裁量空间,但却存在着恣意裁量的可能。如何确定一个合理的调节比例,实现量刑的规范化,成为司法量刑裁判中需要解决的重要问题。“同样情形同样对待”“不同情形不同对待”是量刑公正的基本要求。虽然有
Introduction The Guiding Opinions on Punishment Punishment promulgated by the Supreme People’s Court on December 25, 2013 and the subsequent implementation of the Detailed Rules by the provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government regulate the common regulatory circumstances for the adjustment of the standard penalty. However, the same adjustment of the proportion of sentencing circumstances will inevitably lead to differences in the results of the final adjustment of the reference penalty, thus affecting the final sentencing. Although this gives judges a greater discretionary space, there is the possibility of arbitrary discretion. How to determine a reasonable adjustment ratio and realize the standardization of sentencing has become an important issue to be solved in judicial sentencing. “The same situation the same treatment ” “Different treatment in different situations ” is the basic requirement of sentencing fairness. Although there is