论文部分内容阅读
主观程序正义是人们对于程序是否公平的感受,提高这种公平感有助于塑造对立法、执法和司法的信任,进而有助于法治的实现。经验研究表明,公平感的提升与个体对立法、执法和司法过程的控制感和尊严感的获得紧密相关。十八届三中与四中全会关于“省管司法”与设立巡回法庭的决定,通过彰显中立容易让公众产生更高的控制感;在“公案”中对判决书的语言进行特别的处理和设立不同意见书制度、为民意提供适当的参与司法的通道和执行特定意义上的群众路线,容易让公众产生尊严感;特定的宣传与教育技巧能提高公众感知能力进而提升主观程序正义,这些都有助于产生对立法、执法和司法的信任并最终有利于法治的推进。
Subjective procedural justice is how people feel about the fairness of the program. To improve this sense of fairness helps to build trust in legislation, law enforcement and judiciary, which in turn helps the realization of the rule of law. Empirical studies show that the promotion of fairness is closely related to the individual’s gain of sense of control and dignity in legislation, law enforcement and judicial process. The Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee and the Fourth Plenary Session of the Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China made the decision on “provincial administration of justice” and the establishment of a circuit court to make the public feel more comfortable by demonstrating neutrality. In “Public Case”, the language of the verdict It is easy for the public to have a sense of dignity by handling and setting up a system of different opinions, providing proper public access to justice and implementing a mass line of public opinion in public opinion. Specific publicity and education skills can enhance public perception and enhance subjective procedural justice , All of which contribute to creating trust in legislation, law enforcement and justice and, eventually, the promotion of the rule of law.