论文部分内容阅读
本课题的探讨,是在音乐历史学的范围内展开。论证中依据的材料(文物测音与文献记载)及研究的角度、方法,均与音乐民族学的研究有所不同。现今仍存活的民族音乐以及相应的研究成果,固然可以为音乐史的同类研究在理论思考上提供必要的参照,逆向考察也确曾产生过不少的理论成果。但是早期音阶史问题(尤其是音阶观念形成)的探讨,又很难以经长时间衍变、融汇多项文化因素的现存民族音乐(型态)作为研究的材料来运用。因此,本文仅以现有文物测音与文献记载作为研究的主要依据。
The study of this topic is carried out within the scope of music history. The evidences based on the material (sound recordings and literature records) and research perspectives, methods, are different from the study of music ethnology. Although the current national music and the corresponding research results still provide the necessary reference for the theoretical study of similar studies of music history, it has indeed produced many theoretical achievements in reverse inspection. However, the study of the history of the early scale history (especially the formation of the scale concept) can hardly be used as the research material through the long-time evolution of existing national music that integrates many cultural factors. Therefore, this article is only the main basis for the study of sound measurement and documentation of existing artifacts.