论文部分内容阅读
目的观察不同止血方式应用于腹腔镜下卵巢肿瘤剥离术,对卵巢肿瘤患者卵巢功能的影响。方法 74例单侧卵巢良性肿瘤患者,随机分为对照组与研究组,研究组37例予以传统镜下缝合止血,对照组37例予以双极电凝止血,分析两组患者治疗期间相关情况。结果研究组患者术后出血量与对照组相当,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组患者术后6个月血清性激素明显高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论传统缝合止血方式应用于腹腔镜下卵巢肿瘤剥离术患者,对其卵巢功能影响较小,具有实际应用价值。
Objective To observe the effect of different hemostatic methods on laparoscopic ovarian tumor dissection and ovarian function in ovarian cancer patients. Methods Totally 74 patients with unilateral benign ovarian tumor were randomly divided into control group and study group. 37 cases in study group were treated with conventional microsurgical stitching and hemostasis, while 37 cases in control group were given bipolar coagulation to stop bleeding. The correlation between the two groups was analyzed. Results The amount of postoperative bleeding in the study group was similar to that in the control group, with no significant difference (P> 0.05). The level of serum sex hormone in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group at 6 months after operation (P <0.05) . Conclusion The traditional method of suture hemostasis applied in patients with laparoscopic ovarian tumor dissection, the ovarian function less affected, with practical value.