大陆法系民事诉讼系属理论之解读

来源 :民事程序法研究 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:liandakj2005
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
诉讼系属反映了某个诉讼现正处于某个法院的审理过程中,是对诉讼自起诉时起至诉讼终了整个诉讼过程的高度概括。在传统民事诉讼理论中,特别是在大陆法系国家和地区的民事诉讼中,诉讼系属是一个耳熟能详的法律概念。立法上有关诉讼系属的规定比较具体,学界对其研究比较成熟,也有很强的实践性。我国由于长时间法制建设的中断以及立法中长期奉行“宜简不宜繁”的指导思想,因而在民事诉讼法中没有使用这一概念,理论上也少有人论及这一问题。本文通过对德国、日本和我国台湾地区关于诉讼系属相关规定的考察,借鉴其将诉讼系属与民事诉讼中其他重要理论相联系并指导实践的做法,从而引发对我国民事诉讼系属相关问题的关注和思考。一、诉与诉讼系属 The lawsuit system reflects the fact that a lawsuit is in the process of being heard by a certain court. It is a high-level summary of the entire lawsuit process from the time of prosecution to the end of the lawsuit. In the traditional civil litigation theory, especially in the civil law countries and regions in the civil law system, litigation system is a familiar legal concept. Legislation on the litigation system is more specific rules, the academic research on its more mature, but also very practical. In our country, due to the interruption of legal construction for a long time and the long-term implementation of the guiding ideology of “should be simplified and not complicated” in legislation, the concept of civil procedure law is not used, and in theory, few people deal with this issue. This article examines the related regulations of litigation in Germany, Japan and Taiwan of our country, draws lessons from it and links with other important theories in civil litigation and guides the practice, which leads to the related problems to the civil litigation in our country Concerns and thinking. First, the lawsuit and litigation
其他文献
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.
一、引言自20世纪80年代末以来,在我国的民事司法实践中,一直存在着“起诉难”、“申请再审难”、“执行难”等难题。十届全国人大常委会第三十次会议于2007年10月28日通过了
对于关心云南李昌奎案,以及所有关心着我国死刑政策和实践的人们来说,看到云南省高级人民法院日前发出的对其终审改判李昌奎“死缓”的判决提起再审的决定书,无疑会觉得是一
盛夏七月,浅秋八月,不知是炎热的烦躁,还是琐事的忙碌,整整两月时间,未在空间留存一个文字。对于一个喜爱摆文弄字的人来说,一块钟情热爱的屏地,让它空留荒芜,那种缺失和难过
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.
目次一、引言二、我国立法关于非法证据排除规则的适用范围之相关规定三、评析四、排除范围大小之价值衡量:以美国为线索五、我国非法证据排除范围之完善一、引言非法证据排
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.