论文部分内容阅读
两千零四年,一场“虐俘门”使美国丢掉了“人权卫士”称号,同时使世界人民质疑其国家在标榜“自由、人权、民主”的口号下血腥伪善的真面目。美国媒体和政府在这场“媒介奇观”中的较量以及媒体在公共利益、政府利益和自身利益中的权衡与较量成为各界关注和研究的焦点,在媒体与政府的此起彼伏之中,我们最不应该护士公众的声音,而恰恰在这一受世界瞩目的事件中,公众的声音却被无视与忽略了。本文意在从信息传播渠道过程来分析例证任何信息成为新闻都少不了公众参与的环节。
In 2004, a “prisoner abuse prison” left the United States with the title of “human rights defender,” while making the people of the world question the bloody hypocrisy under the slogan “freedom, human rights, democracy.” The true colors. The contest between the U.S. media and the government in this “media spectacle” and the media’s trade-offs and conflicts in the public interest, the government interest and their own interests have become the focus of attention and research from all walks of life. From the background of the media and the government, we Most should not nurse the public voice, and it is precisely in this world-spotted event, the public voice has been ignored and ignored. This article is intended to analyze and illustrate any information from the process of dissemination of information as part of public participation in the news.