论文部分内容阅读
目的研究和探讨护理干预应用于老年性脑萎缩并发脑出血的效果分析。方法选择我院2014年10至2016年10在我院就诊住院治疗的“老年性脑萎缩并发脑出血”患者62例,按照数字表达分为31例的对照组(常规护理组)与31例的观察组(护理干预组)。护理后采用SCL-90症状自评量表对两组患者的躯体化、焦虑、抑郁以及人际关系进行评分比较。同时对两组患者的护理满意度进行比较。结果观察组患者的SCL-90症状评分分别为(1.41±0.12、1.36±0.21、1.35±0.23、1.31±0.14),明显优于对照组的(1.91±0.24、1.92±0.26、1.89±0.34、1.81±0.27),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);护理后,对照组有4例患者不满意,2例患者感觉较差,满意度为80.64%,观察组仅有1例患者不满意,满意度为96.77%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对老年性脑萎缩并发脑出血的患者采用护理干预措施对其进行护理,能明显改善患者的临床状况,且得到了患者及其家属的一致认可,值得临床推广并应用。
Objective To study and discuss the effect of nursing intervention on senile cerebral atrophy with cerebral hemorrhage. Methods Sixty-two patients with senile cerebral atrophy and intracerebral hemorrhage in our hospital from 10 to 2016 in our hospital from 2014 to 2016 were divided into control group (31 cases) and 31 Cases of observation group (nursing intervention group). After nursing, SCL-90 Symptom Checklist 90 was used to compare the somatization, anxiety, depression and interpersonal relationship between the two groups. At the same time, the two groups of patients with nursing satisfaction were compared. Results The scores of SCL-90 in observation group were (1.41 ± 0.12,1.36 ± 0.21,1.35 ± 0.23,1.31 ± 0.14), which were significantly better than those in control group (1.91 ± 0.24,1.92 ± 0.26,1.89 ± 0.34,1.81 ± 0.27), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). After nursing, 4 patients in the control group were not satisfied, 2 patients felt worse, the satisfaction was 80.64%, only 1 patient in the observation group was not satisfied, Satisfaction was 96.77%, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Nursing interventions for patients with senile cerebral atrophy and cerebral hemorrhage can improve the clinical status of the patients and obtain unanimous endorsement of patients and their families, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.