论文部分内容阅读
网络著作权侵权根据侵权的主体不同,可以分为单纯内容信息服务提供者,单纯技术服务提供者与兼采内容与技术综合运营的服务提供者。前者和网络用户构成了直接侵权的主体部分,间接侵权则包含了教唆、帮助侵权等。我国引进美国的“避风港制度”(即“通知-删除规则”)存在水土不服情况,逐渐变成了侵权者的保护伞。如何使“避风港”回归立法本意,平衡网络服务提供者与网络用户的利益是一个重要问题。对于大量的间接侵权,它适用以过错责任为主,过错推定规则为辅的归责原则,主要通过“应知”“明知”来判断,实现利益平衡。
According to the different subjects of copyright infringement, network copyright infringement can be divided into simple content information service providers, pure technology service providers and service providers that integrate content and technology operations. The former and the network users constitute the main part of direct infringement, indirect infringement includes abetting and helping infringement. China’s introduction of the United States “Safe Harbor System ” (that is “notice - delete rules ”) there is acclimatization, and gradually become the umbrella of the infringer. How to make “safe haven ” return to the original meaning of legislation and balance the interests of network service providers and network users is an important issue. For a large number of indirect infringement, it applies to the principle of fault liability, the fault presumption rules supplemented by the principle of blame, mainly through “should know ” “knowing ” to judge, to achieve the balance of interests.