论文部分内容阅读
大多数“情况说明”不能成为证明案件事实的证据,“情况说明”不是鉴定结论、书证、勘查检验笔录和犯罪嫌疑人、被告人供述和辩解,少数“情况说明”应归入证人证言,个别的可归入视听资料;一些“情况说明”有其存在的合理原因,能作为证据使用,但应该分门别类地加以规范,大量的“情况说明”没有存在的多大必要,应该严格限制使用。
Most of the “circumstances” can not be evidence of the facts of the case, “circumstances ” is not the conclusion of the appraisal, documentary evidence, the survey records and criminal suspects, the defendant confession and excuse, the minority Classified as witness testimony, some can be classified as audio-visual materials; some “case ” has its own reasonable reasons, can be used as evidence, but should be standardized to a large extent, a large number of “circumstances” does not exist How necessary, should be strictly limited use.