《吕氏家塾读诗记》以诗史互证为治经方法,注重以史解诗,借史论阐明诗旨,将史料与诗篇相对证,以诗篇明辩史料之误,从而形成了详审精切的学术特点。但同时吕氏也因过于信赖《诗序》而指摘史料与诗篇不合,质疑甚至误读史料。《吕氏家塾读诗记》这一经学特点的形成,既有汉儒经学传统、二程学术理路以及家学渊源的影响,也深受婺学尊古重史的学术传统影响。以吕祖谦为首的婺州学人承袭并发展了传统诗学,成为平衡宋代诗学的另一股力量,使之不致因一味疑经改经而走向极端,同时为后世《诗经》研究的全面发展存续了生机。 “Lu’s family school reading poetry” with the exchange of poetry and history for each method, pay attention to the historical interpretation of poetry, history theory to clarify the purpose of poetry, the historical evidence and the relative evidence of Psalms, Psalter Clear historical material errors, resulting in a detailed review Exquisite academic features. At the same time, however, Lu also accused the “Preface of Poetry” as being too dependent on the “Preface of the Poetry”, accused the historical materials from being different from the Psalms, questioned or even misread historical materials. The formation of the Confucian classics feature of Lu’s School is not only influenced by the traditions of Confucianism, Confucian classics and home economics, but also influenced by the academic tradition of Wu Xuezun’s ancient history. Wuzhou scholars headed by Lu Zuqian inherited and developed traditional poetics and became another force to balance poetics in the Song Dynasty so as not to be exaggerated due to blindly doubting meridian scriptures and for the all-round development of later studies of the Book of Poetry Survived life.