论文部分内容阅读
1997年4月17日,我局受沈阳某法院委托,对该院受理的一起经济纠纷案件中起诉方出示的一封“证明”文件进行检验,该“证明”文件中书写内容是否有二次补写嫌疑.检材用纸是16开普通书写白纸,文件内容用黑碳素墨水书写,正文共6行字迹,正文下以书信格式贯以“此致”和单位名称日期及公章.经从字迹书写特征上观察检验:全文为同一人书写,但正文第6行字迹与其他字迹比较行距窄、字距密.仅据此特征确认有后添加字迹的根据不足.
On April 17, 1997, our bureau was entrusted by a court in Shenyang to examine a “proof” document presented by the prosecutor in an economic dispute case accepted by the court, and whether there was a second order in the “proof” document Fill in the suspect .Paper paper is 16 open normal writing white paper, the contents of the document written in black carbon ink, the text of a total of 6 lines of writing, the text formatted in correspondence to the “Chi” and the name of the unit date and official seal. Verification of handwriting characteristics: The full text is written by the same person, but the text of the sixth line of the text is narrower than the other handwriting and is densely arranged.