论文部分内容阅读
目前学术界对于“十七年”史学道路的评价存在很大分歧。按常理,该问题本来不难作出正确判断。因为,新中国成立后十七年,尽管前进的道路曲折,1957年以后产生“左”的错误,但国家建设的成绩是主要的,缺点和错误只能居于第二位;那么,作为全局的一部分,对于历史学领域的估价,也应当作如是观。但实际上人们的认识却大为歧异。有研究者认为新中国成立后十七年史学界教条主义盛行,整个中国史变成一部农民战争史,将十七年史学贬低为“完全政治化”的史学,完全依附于政治,毫无学术性可言。甚至将“十七
At present, the academic circles have very different opinions on the evaluation of the historical course of ”Seventeen Years“. As usual, the problem was not difficult to make a correct judgment. Because after the founding of New China, despite the tortuous path ahead and the ”Left“ mistakes made after 1957, the achievements of state construction are the major ones with the shortcomings and mistakes being only the second highest. As a result, Part of the overall situation, for the valuation of history, should also be as concept. But in fact people’s understanding is very different. Some researchers think that 17 years after the founding of new China, the academic dogmatism prevailed. The entire Chinese history turned into a history of peasant wars, and the 17-year historiography was belittled as a historiography of ”total politicization.“ It completely adhered to politics. No academic at all. Even ”seventeen