由于某些客观原因,本刊收到晓理同志的文稿晚了一些,但读罢此文,感到晓理的反批评意见是颇有些道理的,故不嫌来稿迟迟,仍全文照发。文艺批评是文艺欣赏的深化,而这种“深化”理应建立在实事求是和各抒己见、百家争鸣的基础之上,才可能得出准确、精辟的结论,才可能真正发挥文艺批评的功效。《岁月长长路长长》播出后,之所以能在全国观众中引起较大的反响,其原因恐怕是多方面的。当前,下岗女工再就业的问题确实已成为全社会关注 的一个“热点”,文艺作品如何去更好地开掘这一题材?如何使它在社会上产生更为积极的作用?这是值得我们电视文艺工作者思考的问题。我们热忱地欢迎各界朋友来稿参与讨论,发表意见。 Due to some objective reasons, the journal received a version of Comrade Xiaoliang later, but after reading this article, I feel that the anti-criticism of Xiao Li is quite reasonable. Literary criticism is the deepening of literary appreciation, and this “deepening” should be based on seeking truth from facts and expressing opinions on the basis of a hundred schools of thought, it is possible to come to accurate and insightful conclusions, we can really play the effectiveness of literary criticism. After the broadcast of “Long Years of Long Road,” the reason why it can arouse great repercussions among the national audience is probably due to many reasons. At present, the issue of re-employment of laid-off women workers has indeed become a “hot spot” for the attention of the whole society. How can the literary and artistic works better explore this topic? How can it be made to have a more active role in the society? It is worth our television Literary and art workers to think about the problem. We warmly welcome friends from all walks of life to participate in the discussion and make comments.