论文部分内容阅读
相比今年迎春拍“试水”的春意浓浓,2009年5月各大拍卖公司的春拍收获可谓“盆满钵满”。然而几乎同时,这种回暖的欣喜气氛很快湮没在赝品的纷争中,香港苏富比、香港佳士得、北京保利纷纷陷入“赝品风波门”。作为衡量拍卖市场指数的数字越来越引起艺术界的质疑与讨论。忽略拍卖背后的这些是是非非,那么,从拍卖本身来讲,作为媒体的我们如何看待春拍?今年春拍有何特色?
Compared to the Spring Festival this year, “Spring water test” strong, in May 2009 the auction of the spring auction can be described as “pours”. However, almost at the same time, this warmth of rejoicing was quickly obliterated in the disputes of counterfeits. Sotheby’s Hong Kong, Christie’s Hong Kong and Poly Poly in Beijing all plunged into “counterfeit storm doors.” As a measure of the index of the auction market more and more caused the art community to question and discuss. Ignoring these behind the auction is right and wrong, then, from the auction itself, as a media how we look at the spring auction? What are the characteristics of this spring auction?