论文部分内容阅读
微观构造变革的实践表明,“两权分离”所具有的实际意义与我们赋予它的现实涵义的本质差异,不可避免地诱发出众多难以逾越的客观障碍,导致微观经济构造变革过程中的重重困难。所有权与经营权分离首先表现为所有权收益和经营权收益的分离。但由于两权分离的相对性决定着两种收益的界限上的模糊性必然造成包容在全民企业内的国家、集体和个人三者利益的对立冲突。由于所有权对经营权的必然干预,不仅使由于生产资料占有差异引起的收益差异与由于经营水平的差异带来的收益差异无法明确区分,而且难以完成利益关系的合理调整。从现有的改革方案中,寻找不到解决上述矛盾的令人满意的答案。
The practice of microstructural reform shows that the actual difference between the “two-power separation” and the actual meaning we have given it inevitably induces many insurmountable objective obstacles, leading to many difficulties in the process of microeconomic structural change. . Separation of ownership and management rights is first manifested as separation of ownership income and operating income. However, because of the relativity of the separation of powers, the ambiguity on the boundary between the two types of incomes will inevitably lead to the conflict between the interests of the state, collectives, and individuals that are inclusive in the entire people’s enterprise. Due to the inevitable intervention of ownership on the right to operate, not only the differences in returns due to differences in the means of production ownership and the differences in returns due to differences in operating levels can not be clearly distinguished, but it is difficult to complete the reasonable adjustment of interests. From the existing reform programs, we could not find a satisfactory answer to the above contradictions.