纪念碑风波开始考虑为父亲树碑是在去葬礼的路上。葬礼结束后我与一位搞艺术的朋友同坐一辆车,我对他谈了想物色一位雕塑家为父亲设计纪念碑,他略加思索后说埃恩斯特·涅伊兹韦斯内是唯一合适的人选。那时我对涅伊兹韦斯内和雕塑艺术很少了解,我的知识领域是火箭、卫星,它们的启动成功和失败。当然,父亲在艺术馆对那些“抽象派艺术家”大吼大叫以及批评艺术倾向中的西方意识形态反映等言论也不时传到我耳中。尽管父亲的话也有一定道理,但是我对他这样武断地横加指责并不以为然。过去父亲对文学艺术一向持支持态度,要知道正是出自他本人命令才出版了叶甫图申科的《斯大林的继承者们》、特瓦尔多夫斯基的《焦尔金游地府》、卡扎克维奇的《蓝色笔记本》这些曾遭批判的作品。我还记得他同苏斯洛夫的一次口角。苏斯洛夫认为在卡扎克维奇的书中提到季诺维耶夫的名字是不能允许的。父亲微微一笑反驳道:“这是合乎情理的。难道您希望伊里奇同季诺维耶夫谈话而不称呼其名,那么他如何同他交谈?可不能改写历史。”但是,在父亲政治生涯的最后一段时期,掌管意识形态的苏斯洛夫和伊利切夫(党中央意识形态委员 Monument to the storm began to consider the father of the monument is on the way to the funeral. After the funeral, I was in the same car with an art friend, and I talked to him about looking for a sculptor to design a monument for his father. After a moment’s thought, he said that Ernst Neizvensne Is the only suitable candidate. At that time, I knew very little about Neiz Zweisi and the art of sculptures. My area of ​​knowledge was rockets, satellites, their success and failure. From time to time, of course, my father’s remarks about the “abstract artist” yelling at the Museum of Art and the Western ideological reflections on criticizing the artistic tendency have also come to my ears from time to time. Although my father’s words have some truth, I disagree with him so arbitrarily. In the past, his father always held a supportive attitude towards literature and art, and he must know that it was from his own orders that Stalin’s successors were published by Yevushuto-Tysco, that of Djal’davski, Kazakovic’s “Blue Notebook” These have been criticized works. I remember his mouth with Suslov. Suslov argues that the mention of Zinoviev in the book by Kazakavić is impermissible. Father smiled slightly retorted: “This is reasonable. Do you want Ilyich to talk to Zinoviev without addressing his name, so how can he talk to him? Can not rewrite history.” However, in his father’s political career In the last period of time, the ideologists Suslov and Elitchev (members of the CPC Central Committee’s ideology