论文部分内容阅读
有关限定与非限定的研究,最早可追溯到古罗马时期语文学家对拉丁语语法的描写。此后,众多不同的语言学理论或流派都对其进行了深入的探讨,并取得了丰硕的研究成果。但不同理论的切入点和处理方法并不完全一致,彼此对限定与非限定的概念内涵、鉴别标准以及研究方法的认识尚存在较大的争议。但纵观西方已有的研究,总体而言,对此问题的探讨绝大部分是集中在形态语言中来进行的,而对非形态语言则关注较少。因此,限定与非限定如何在非形态语言中得以表征仍需要进一步的研究。
The limited and unqualified research can be traced back to the description of Latin grammar by ancient linguists. Since then, many different linguistic theories or genres have conducted in-depth discussions on them, and have achieved fruitful research results. However, different theoretical points of entry and approach are not exactly the same, each other on the limited and unqualified connotation, identification standards and research methods there is still much controversy. Looking at the existing research in the West, however, most of the discussions on this issue are focused on morphological language while less on non-morphological languages. Therefore, the definition and non-definition of non-morphological language can be characterized still need further study.